|Peter Bowditch's Web Site|
|Home | Interests | Writing | Speaking | Teaching | Books | Podcast | Blog|
Iím probably wasting my time writing this because we will all be dead or ascended into heaven by the time you would normally be reading it. The world that we know is supposed to end on May 21, just about the time the magazine is supposed to be arriving in your letterboxes.
Thatís right Ė the latest prediction from some religious folk for the end of time is May 21, 2011, and it must be true because I read it on the Internet.
Despite Jesus clearly saying that nobody would know when he was returning, people who claim great faith in the Bible keep ignoring this and foolishly declaring definite dates. In 2009, for example, one religious group announced the Rapture would happen on September 21, September 23, (mercifully missing my birthday on the 22nd), plus several more dates in 2009 as each deadline passed unnoticed.
There is always the possibility that life might continue beyond May, but donít get too complacent because if 2011 doesnít get you December 2012 will.
Scholars examining the ancient Mayan calendar have established that it only runs until December 21, 2012. After this there will be no more days, much as there was no time before the Big Bang. Everything will stop because there wonít be a name for it.
One thing inspiring confidence is the track record of apocalyptic predictions in the past. Unless Iíve managed to transform into a solipsist while I wasnít paying attention, it must be obvious that all the predictions made in the past have failed to come true, so letís look at a few of them
The Seventh Day Adventist Church grew out of a movement founded by William Miller, whose first prediction of the end was "some time in 1843", later modified to "some time between March 21 1843 and March 21 1844". When March 22 1844 came and went Millerís followers (known as Millerites) did some more refining, finally deciding that Jesus would return on October 22, 1844. This date is now known as The Great Disappointment.
Another manifestation of religious apocalypsism drove much of the Y2K hysteria, as 2000 was seen by some as the time mentioned in Revelation when Jesus would return to punish the wicked. When this became entwined with a largely-manufactured hysteria about how all the computers were going to fail it became a very lonely business to be a skeptic. (Strangely, there was little congratulation of the skeptics afterwards.) Many of the religious loons (and I used that word kindly) actually expressed hope that all technology would cease to work, as the subsequent collapse of society would trigger Armageddon. By the way, millennial fever isnít new and Charles Mackayís excellent 1841 book "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds" described madness in London in 999 that was echoed in major cities around the world in 1999.
Then there was May 15, 2003, when the mysterious twelfth planet, Planet X, was going to pass close to the Earth and stop the Earthís rotation on its axis. (No, I donít know why the twelfth planet wasnít called Planet XII.)There was a backup for that date in case it didnít happen, because the sudden reversal of the Earthís magnetic field on May 23 was going to wreck everything anyway.
Am I worried that the world will stop for me on May 21? Not really. Am I worried that we will run out of calendar days in December 2012? Not any more than the Mayan coffee vendors I saw at a Mind Body Spirit Festival who just happened to be right next to and totally ignoring a stand declaring that all Mayans believed that the end of the world was coming.
You might ask why I am writing about this nonsense in a science magazine. Itís because science is not just about test tubes, doctorates and hadron colliders. It is a process of rational thought and a search for the truth about the universe we live in. I was drawn into the "official" skeptical community in 1999 because I saw the uncritical thinking, the reliance on anecdote and the rejection of evidence that drove much of the computer-related Y2K hysteria. People have every right to believe what they like, but there is a process which can examine the probability that some event might happen. That process is called "science", and while it has sometimes been lightly dusted over some of the predictions I have mentioned a true application would have revealed them all as nonsense before any damage was done.
There are enough real problems about the future, such as climate change, population growth and resource depletion, without wasting our scientific and intellectual effort on nonsense. Apply the science to the nonsense and then move on.
I will see you all next month. I hope.
This article was published as the Naked Skeptic column in the June 2011 edition of Australasian Science
|Copyright © 1998- Peter Bowditch|
Logos and trademarks belong to whoever owns them
Authorisation to mechanically or electronically copy the contents of any material published in Australasian Science magazine is granted by the publisher to users licensed by Copyright Agency Ltd. Creative Commons does not apply to this page.